QFR versus FFR in the 2-year follow-up of FAVOR III Europe: Original Research

4 Visioni

  • Grazie! Condividilo con i tuoi amici!

    Non hai gradito questo video. Grazie per il feedback!

admin
Published
In this episode, Dr Aaysha Cader speaks with Dr Birgitte Andersen about the latest findings from the FAVOR III Europe trial, recently published in EuroIntervention.

The conversation explores the 2-year follow-up comparing quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in coronary physiology assessment. Particular attention is given to the key outcome that QFR did not demonstrate non-inferiority at one year, raising important questions about reproducibility and variability in clinical practice.

Dr Andersen discusses potential explanations for these findings, including early event rate differences, and reflects on what this means for clinical decision-making. The episode also highlights the need for further research to better identify patient populations that may benefit most from angiography-based physiological assessment.

This episode is part of the Editor’s Choice podcast series from EuroIntervention, highlighting key publications and expert perspectives in interventional cardiology.
This podcast series is also available on EuroIntervention website and on EuroIntervention podcast platforms. Click here to learn more:
https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/pages/editors-choice-podcast-by-eurointervention

Read the full review published in EuroIntervention: https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/article/quantitative-flow-ratio-versus-fractional-flow-reserve-2-year-follow-up-of-the-favor-iii-europe-trial

#InterventionalCardiology #QFR #FFR #MedicalResearch #EuroIntervention #MedEd #ClinicalResearch
Categoria
Cardiology
Commenta per primo questo video.

Prossimo